Sunday, January 9, 2011

Whoops! Will China's Government Pay Heed To One Of Its Central Bankers?

Central banker urges China to cut U.S. debt holdings: report
China should further diversify its huge foreign exchange reserves away from U.S. government debt to reduce its risk exposure, a central bank official said in comments published on Monday.

Here's the news report from reuters:  LINK

One would have to guess that this comment out of China this evening is why the dollar is lower and gold/silver have popped higher from Friday's close.

Friday, January 7, 2011

Friday Funnies - Dorks:




Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Gold, Silver, Mining Stocks and Fiat Money

I'm getting a lot of fear-based inquiry about the price action in the precious metals sector this week. And for sure, both the financial bubble media and a lot of blogosphere are helping to fuel this fear. So I wanted to comment on the action.

To begin with, the BEST contrarian indicator out there - Dennis Gartman - confidently announced that he was contemplating shorting SLV. That's the single best indication that this correction may be closer to its end than its start.

Before I make case that this correction could end soon, let me just remind everyone that before the Central Banks ran out of gold to unload in order to manipulate the market, 200 day moving average (dma) corrections in gold,silver,HUI/XAU were not uncommon, especially after a big bull run like we have had since August. We could indeed be in the midst of one of those corrections, although that is not my view (we did set up our fund defensively during the last 2 weeks of December). I'm just saying that this is a volatile, highly manipulated market sector and, from a law of probability standpoint, the market is overdue for some downside volatility.

Having said that, the HUI has corrected down to its 50 dma and I believe that it's likely to hold there. But don't be surprised if we see some days with wild volatility and I've lived through periods where silver and the HUI blow through their 200 dma's to the downside and it feels like a market collapse.

Aside from the Gartman indicator, the physical demand from India, China and Japan on this price correction has accelerated. Historically, the relatively lower physical demand component made Comex paper-induced corrections a lot more savage. But now Central Banks globally have become very large net buyers of gold and the populations in these countries have also stepped up their accumulation, commensurate with their growing level of wealth. Here are some quotes from JB's Gold-jottings report, which can be accessed at www.lemetropolecafe.com: UBS reports “…demand really picked up in the $1380-1390 area. Our physical sales to India yesterday were the highest in 12 months - from a time when gold was trading around $1100;" Reuters adds confirmation: "There is renewed enthusiasm in market after markets crashed by $40 yesterday, I booked deals for 200 kgs from yesterday evening from $1,417 and below," said a dealer with a state-run bank in Mumbai.”

Another interesting data point I picked up on this morning is that yesterday's Comex open interest in gold/silver actually increased. This is a startling contradiction to the usual substantial decline in o/i on big down days. Given that both today and yesterday paper gold/silver went off a cliff exactly on the Comex open, the bullion banks are clearly aggressively attempting a COT open interest liquidation, which historically would take the market down 10-20% on average. But yesterday's o/i report suggests that much stronger hands have moved into the long side of the Comex paper market and are not so easily stopped out of their positions.

Again, I am not willing to say at this point that this price correction has run its course. However we have started to shift our fund into a more neutral posture with regard to our expectations. To be sure, historically these price corrections have been a lot more severe in depth and duration. But, for now, I am leaning toward a view that we are closer to the end of this pullback than historical norms would suggest. Thanks Dennis!

As for the "Fiat Money" part of my title, once again Alisdair Macleod has hit a home run with an extraordinarily well-written essay on the death of fiat money. Here's a snippet:
This is why we might call 2011 the year money starts to die. The central banks are beginning to lose control over bubbles one and two, and also bullion. The destruction of private sector savings has coincided with expanding budget deficits so the expansion of the money bubble will have to continue to contain the situation, because there is no alternative. (emphasis is mine)
And here's the link: Must Read

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Must-Read Interview With David Stockman...

I always thought this guy was one of the best minds to go thru Washington, DC - except for his original Reaganomics ideas.  It's good see him back-peddaling on that.  Here's a salient quote from him about what a lie TARP was:
First of all, that's urban mythology. I don't think there was panic on Main Street in America. What there was was that the big pyramids of debt were crashing down on Wall Street and had we allowed nature to take its course, maybe the Goldman Sachs stock would have gone down to $10, but that's their problem and the problem of the financial speculators who owned the stock. Not a systematic problem for the economy.
Here's a link to the rest from clusterstock.com:  LINK

Geithner Lets Bank of America Off The Hook For 1 Cent On The Dollar

The potential liability of $127 billion in mortgages sold by Countrywide, which collapsed and then was bailed out by BAC in a smokey back room deal which involved the U.S. Treasury, was just settled in BAC's favor for 1 cent per dollar of potential Taxpayer liablity.  These were loans which were flipped into Fannie Mae, which is now owned by the Treasury/Taxpayer.  Here's the link:  LINK Mr. Ritholtz makes an interesting quote:  "My biggest complaint about the GSEs post government takeover is that they have been used as a back door bailout of the banks. This latest deal reconfirms that view."

Interestingly, this was a prediction I made back in 2002:  The Government would eventually take over FNM/FRE and use them monetize the mortgage/housing collapse.  We are there.  Make no mistake, there will be QE3, 4, 5 and the precious metals will eventually hit pricing levels, in U.S. dollars, which will shock people.

Please note for the record:  the media/blogosphere keeps referring to this deal as being between Bank of America and Fannie Mae.  Unequivocally, this deal is 100% between Tim Geithner as agent for the U.S. taxpayer and Bank of America.  Period.  This is because the Govt/Taxpayer owns FNM.

The more I ponder this deal, the more I believe there is a great case for fraudulent conveyance:  from BAC to the Govt AND from the Govt/Tim Geithner to the Taxpayer.  I hope someone pursues this.

Monday, January 3, 2011

This Is Bad News For Dollar Bulls: India To Stop Using The Dollar In Oil Trading With Iran

Here's the new report:  LINK

The Housing Market Could Get Annihilated In 2011...

Happy New Year everyone! Back in 2002 I made the prediction that housing values would eventually drop 70-80% from peak bubble valuations. Of course, back then I would have been horrified to know just how high prices were to get by 2007. At this point, in a lot of markets prices have dropped 10-20% on average so far, with 40-50% declines (or more at the high end) in the worst bubble States (Cali, FLA, Nevada, Arizona). The late and great Sir John Templeton, who was one of the pioneers of the modern mutual fund industry and a highly regarded investor, said in an interview sometime in 2002 that he would not touch U.S. real estate until it had fallen by 90% in value. I'm sticking with my call.

As to be expected, the mass financial media and most real estate market professionals (and of course a lot folks who have been well-trained by the Fed to "buy the dip" over the last 30 years) expect that the worst is over for the sector. Au contraire, mon frére (I guess I should say "al contrario, il mio amico - lol), there are several key forces at play, most of which go underreported, not reported, or are based on industry/Govt data which is highly manipulated.

Inventory - The biggest problem facing the housing market is the massive inventory sitting out there. Of course, the Nat'l Assoc. of Realtors reports the inventory of homes for sale to be around 3.7 million, or 9.5 month supply based on the existing rate of sales. Remember that rate of homes sales is still declining - existing home sales were down 28% for Nov '10 vs. '09 and new home sales were down 21% - so as we go forward, unless this rate picks up, the number of months it would take to clear the existing "for sale" inventory increases.

But there is a "shadow" inventory out there defined as pending REO (bank owned), pending foreclosed inventory and homes with mortgages in serious delinquency. Corelogic has defined this number to be around 2 million homes. Here's a great chart I borrowed from calculatedriskblog.com:

(click on chart to enlarge)

As you can see, if you include the homes that are likely to be foreclosed and assumed by the banks, a more realistic estimate of the housing inventor is close to 6 million.  And there are also a lot of people who are not in danger of defaulting on their mortgage, but who would sell if the market "bounces."  If you are skeptical of the forces of foreclosure, here's a news report from Reuters that came out last week describing the big jump in foreclosures during Q3:  LINK

So just based on the pure, good old fashioned law of supply/demand, there is going to have to be a major downward adjustment in the price of housing in order to clear this massive inventory overhanging the market.

Credit Markets - The biggest factor here is interest rates.  For several reasons, not the least of which is the rapidly expanding Government spending deficit and Treasury bond supply, interest rates will continue moving higher during 2011.  This factor alone, unless you have cash to buy a house, will make the current price level of housing unsustainable as the higher cost of a mortgage will reduce the overall amount someone can pay for a home by reducing the size of an affordable mortgage.  This is going to hammer the mid-priced housing segment. 

The other obvious factor here is the much tighter standards being enforced on mortgage lenders.  No more "liar" loans, pay-option ARMS and "sub-primers" qualifying for conventional GSE mortgages.  This factor not only eliminates a chunk of the population that had been buying homes during the bubble, but it too reduces that size of mortgage most people can assume. 

And finally, there is another tsunami of adjustable rate mortgage resets and refi's coming in 2011. Here's a chart to illustrate that is from Credit Suisse (edit in red is mine):

(click on chart to enlarge)

As you can see, the housing market price collapse that started in 2007 is highly correlated with the first wave of resets.  It took a few trillion of printed dollars from the Fed and the Treasury in order to stabilize the banking system and slow down the collapse in housing from this first wave.  Take a look at the size and composition of the second wave.  The beige bars are the nefarious pay-option ARMS, which were designed to let people opt not to pay most of their mortgage, with the unpaid portion added to outstanding mortgage balance.  It was this garbage that took down Countrywide, Washington Mutual and Wachovia.  The credit obligation from that abortion was largely transferred to the Treasury (i.e. the taxpayer).  Rest assured, the pay-option reset factor alone will make this next default wave even more nuclear than the last one.  (Also, I am skipping over all of the related collateral destruction the first time around, which includes the implosion of the big mortgage reinsurance companies, including AIG - who's garbage found a home with the U.S. Treasury).   This will devastate housing/real estate values.

There are several other factors which will further influence the declining value of housing and real estate.  The most prevalent being the general weak condition of the economy in the U.S.  And I am of the view that the economy will double dip this year (although massive QE/money printing may prevent this).   The reality is that the two major factors discussed above will be sufficient to cause what I believe will be a much larger than expected (by the media/Wall Street in general) decline in housing values during 2011.  I would not be surprised to see at least 10% in most markets.  While I have stopped putting a definitive timeframe on my economic/market predictions, I still believe that average prices in the housing market will get cut in half from here before this over.


 

©  Powered by Simple Healthy